Prof. Maulid Mwatawala's Professorial Inaugural Lecture

Professorial Inaugural Lecture is an opportunity for newly-promoted or appointed Professors to inform colleagues in the University and the general public, about their achievements in research, innovation and teaching activities.

On March 20, 2018 Prof. Maulid Walad Mwatawala from the Department of Crop Science and Horticulture of Sokoine University of Agriculture delivered a powerful professorial inaugural lecture on Facilitating International Agricultural Trade through Science: The Case of Tephritid Flies. His lecture highlighted key research findings on fruit flies based on studies conducted at SUA in collaboration with other partners. The information that was generated by years of research is necessary to facilitate fruits trade while minimising the risks of the spread of fruit flies. The lecture showed further that this information is shared through various means including an international training on taxonomy and ecology of fruit flies. In this post you can watch and read his entire lecture presentations.

Prof. Maulid Walad Mwatawala of Sokoine University of Agriculture presenting his professorial inaugural lecture on Facilitating International Agricultural Trade through Science: The Case of Tephritid Flies

Prof. Maulid Walad Mwatawala of Sokoine University of Agriculture presenting his professorial inaugural lecture on Facilitating International Agricultural Trade through Science: The Case of Tephritid Flies

Acknowledgement

I would like to thank all the Donors who supported my research work; The Belgian Development Cooperation (DGOS), The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), International Foundation for Science (IFS) and Danish International Development Agency (DANIDA). The works I did would never have been possible without their financial and material support.

I would like to extend my sincere thanks to Professors Robert Machang’u, Rhodes Makundi and Amon Maerere of Sokoine University of Agriculture (SUA) for paving my way into the world of research. Special thanks to Dr. Marc De Meyer of the Royal Museum for Central Africa (RMCA), of Tervuren Belgium for mentoring and linking me to the world of fruit flies research.

I would like to thank colleagues Dr, Massimiliano Virgilio of RMCA, Dr. Gration Rwegasira and Dr.  Lilian Shechambo of SUA for their valuable contribution   to our research projects. Thanks are extended to field assistants, Mr. Frank Senkondo, the late Yasin Mgoba, Ms. Resta Maganga and all undergraduate and graduate students who participated in fruit flies and weaver ants’ research.

I am deeply indebted to the Vice Chancellor and Deputy Vice Chancellors of Sokoine University of Agriculture for their support and encouragement to deliver this inaugural lecture.

I would like to acknowledge the support from my family, my wife Natasha, and my children Shaquille, Haaris and Faaris and my niece Mulhat. Last but not least, I would like to thank everyone who has helped me in one way or another during my tenure as a student at SUA, in my academic career as a researcher and a professor.

Foreword 

Mr. Chairman,
Vice Chancellor,
Deputy Vice Chancellors,
Principals, 
Dean, and Directors,
Colleague Professors,
Member of Academic Staff,
Members of the Press, 
Distinguished Invited Guests Ladies and Gentlemen.

I am greatly honoured to stand before you to deliver this lecture on the role of science in facilitating international agricultural trade. My talk focuses on fruits trade as affected by a group of insects collectively known as fruit flies or Teprhritids. Most of us have heard about fruit flies because of the contribution of Drosophildae in genetics studies. However, the group I am referring to in this lecture is the “true fruit flies”, which is different from Drosophilidae “the fruit flies of genetics lab”. The behaviour of the two groups is different. Drosophila feed on dead decomposing matter, while Tephritids attack healthy fruits.

My inspiration on fruit flies came from by the then Director of SUA Pest Management Centre (SPMC) Prof. Robert Machang’u through the then Head of Department of Crop Science and Production Prof. Amon Maerere. How it started was that Prof Machang’u liked his guava fruit, but was always annoyed by maggots crawling inside his beloved fruits. He shared his distaste to a Belgian colleague who told him about fruit flies research at the Royal Museum for Central Africa (RMCA) of Tervuren, Belgium under Dr Marc De Meyer. The link with RMCA was established and a proposal was developed for a research project which was funded by the Belgian Development Cooperation Agency (DGOS). I became a PhD student under the project; and that was the start of my journey in the fruit flies research.

Over the years, from 2004 we have been researching on fruit flies and have contributed substantially to the literature on ecology,  biology and management of this group of pests. Today SUA is regarded as a Centre of expertise on this group of flies and the University is now a champion of an international course on fruit fly systematics and ecology. I feel humbled because, sincerely speaking, I never dreamt of becoming an academic, let alone being an applied entomologist. When I graduated with Master;s degree from SUA in 1998 ago I joined my friends and we formed a company called Fortune Media and registered an entertainment magazine called Rockers. However my fate, it seems, was to become what I am today. So today, I am going to share with you our research findings we have gathered over the years and how information we generated has contributed to international fruits trade. Throughout my talk, I will be highlighting specific roles played by SUA.

Abstract

International agricultural trade is important in addressing spatial and temporal food shortages across the globe. Agricultural trade generates income and contributes to economies of many countries. Unfortunately, there are various risks associated with the movement of agricultural commodities across borders. The spread of pests across countries is one of the great risks. The International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC), which is an agreement between nations, aims at preventing and controlling the introduction and spread of pests of plants and plant products across national boundaries. IPPC formulates various standards and guidelines that can be adopted by member states to formulate municipal phytosanitary laws against the introduction of pests. Countries normally conduct Pest Risk Analysis (PRA) in order to facilitate agricultural trade. This process requires scientific evidence on the identity and occurrences of pests in an area and a possible entry and the establishment and the spread of those pests into exotic places. Fruits and vegetable trade is important for food and security among the global population. However, fruit trade introduces the risk of the spread of pests, including fruit flies. Most fruit flies cause heavy losses to the fruit industry and these are therefore of quarantine importance. Research which has been conducted across the globe provided scientific evidence on the possible spread of fruit flies in order to facilitate trade. The Sokoine University of Agriculture (SUA) collaborated with various partners in the world to generate important information that is a prerequisite for conducting PRA. This inaugural lecture highlights key findings that include identification  of new species, resolution of cryptic species, host range and preference, spatial and temporal distribution, and mitigation options against the selected economically important fruit flies.

Key words: International trade, fruits, fruit flies, quarantine

1.0 International agricultural trade

1.1 Importance of international agricultural trade
Food production is not uniform across regions of the world because of inherent climatic variations and other reasons. Spatial and temporal variation in food shortages is therefore a common phenomenon. There is no country in the world that is permanently food sufficient. There are people who are malnourished or undernourished even in countries with agricultural surpluses. There are over 800 million people in many countries – particularly in Africa and Asia – who are still suffering from hunger (WHO). Agricultural trade therefore helps to address food production shortages and contributes to farmers’ income and economic growth of these countries. The expansion of agricultural trade has helped provide greater quantities, wider variety and better quality food to increased numbers of people and at lower prices. Agricultural trade also generates income and gives a sense of wellbeing to the millions of people who are directly or indirectly involved in it. At the national level, in many countries agricultural trade is a major source of foreign exchange which is necessary to finance imports and development programmes.

1.2 Risks associated with international agricultural trade
International agricultural trade involves movements of bulk quantities of food across borders. Such a trend poses a great risk of introducing pests associated with such cross border commodities to exotic areas. Such risks have to be contained in order to facilitate international movement of agricultural products. The International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC) is a 1951 multilateral treaty instituted by the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organisation (UN FAO). The treaty aims at securing coordinated, effective action of preventing and controlling the introduction and spread of pests of plants and plant products. Thus, the Convention extends beyond the protection of cultivated plants to the protection of natural flora and plant products. The Convention    is recognized by the World Trade Organisation’s (WTO) Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures  (SPS  Agreement)  as the only international standard setting body for plant health. For example, the International Standards for Phytosanitary Measures (ISPMs) are prepared by the Secretariat of the IPPC as part of the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization’s global programme of policy  and  technical  assistance  in  plant quarantine. This programme makes these standards, guidelines, and recommendations available to FAO Members and other interested parties so as to achieve international harmonization of phytosanitary measures, with the aim of facilitating trade and avoid the use of unjustifiable measures as barriers to trade. Quarantine pests are of particular importance to international agricultural trade. IPPC (1997) defines a quarantine pests as “a pest of potential economic importance to the area endangered thereby and not yet present there, or present but not widely distributed and being officially controlled”.
 
1.3 International trade of fruits
Fruits are important crops for food security and human nutrition. Fruits consumption can help prevent a wide range of diseases (Yao et al., 2004; Potter, 2005; Szajdek and Borowska, 2008). Fruits supply vitamins and minerals to the diet and protect populations from diseases (Slavin and Lloyd, 2012;  Lim et al., 2012; Bellavia et al., 2013; Hung et al., 2004; Dauchet et al., 2006). The demand for fresh fruits has been increasing (Weinberger and Lumpkin, 2007) and this has led to an increase of global production of tropical fresh fruits from
12.5 million tons in 1994 to 22.1 million tons in 2013 (FAOSTAT).

Trade in fruit and vegetable products has been among the most dynamic areas of international agricultural trade, which is stimulated by rising incomes and growing consumer interest in product variety, freshness, convenience, and year- round availability. Advances in production, postharvest handling, processing, and logistical technologies, along with increased levels of international investment—have been instrumental. For developing countries, trade in fruits and vegetables has been attractive in the face of highly volatile or declining long-term trends in the prices for many traditional export products. Although many developing-country suppliers have entered the field, relatively few have achieved significant, sustained success, which means that the industry is highly competitive and rapidly changing. Despite the increase in demand and production, much of the world’s population, however, does not consume the recommended five servings of fruits and vegetables daily. Potential increase in fruits production is still constrained by abiotic and biotic stresses such as fruit flies. Most fruit flies are of quarantine importance and jeopardise movement fruits trade globally.

1.4 Fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) as a constraint to international fruits trade
True fruit flies”, also known as Tephritid flies, are picture-winged flies of variable sizes and shapes and have a worldwide distribution (De Meyer, 2001). They are called “true” fruit flies to differentiate them from Drosophila spp., which are commonly found on rotting fruits and other foodstuffs. Tephritid flies spend part of their life cycle in a fruit, while Drosophilaspp simply feed on rotting fruits.

The currently acknowledged classification of fruit flies was presented by Norrbom et al. (1999) who divide the family Tephritidae into three sub families; Phytalmiinae Tephritinae and Trypetinae. The sub family Trypatinae is divided into different tribes including Adramini, Ortalotrypetini, Rivelliomimini, Toxotrypsnini, Carpomyini, Zaceratini, Trypetini and Dacini. The Afrotropical species belong to the tribe Dacini which is divided into three sub tribes; Ceratitidina, Dacina and Gastrozonina. The sub tribe Dacina includes Bactrocera and Dacus while Ceratitidina includes Capparimyia, Tririthrum and Ceratitis.
 
Fruit flies (Tephritid flies) are pests of quarantine importance. Some attack fruits and others attack grasses. The general biology of fruit flies is well known. The larvae of the fly develop and feed inside a fruit and cause high losses in quantity and quality. (White and Elson-Harris, 1992). Strong quarantine measures are therefore enforced against fruit flies to prevent their spread. Exporting fruit flies infested fruits could result into losses of international markets and losses of goodwill in trade. Fruit flies are important in quarantine because the distribution of major pest genera is geographically limited. According to White and Elson- Harris (1992), the Family Tephritidae is represented in all  regions  of  the world except Antarctica. The major pest genera are nevertheless restricted to particular geographical regions as presented by White and Elson-Harris (1992). Anastrepha spp. attacks a wide range of fruits in South and Central America and West Indies. The genus Rhagoletis is found in South and Central America. Bactrocera spp. is native to tropical Asia, and the South Pacific regions with a few species found in Africa.

The genus Ceratitis is known to be of Afrotropical origin while the genus Dacus is also represented in the Afrotropical region with a few species in the Oriental region. The Afrotropical region which comprises of Africa south of the Sahara has also been invaded by several Bactrocera species. The various sub-genera of Ceratitis have been revised by De Meyer (1996; 1998a; 1998b; 2000b), De Meyer and Copeland (2001) and De Meyer and Freidberg (2005); whereas the genera Dacus and Bactrocera have been revised by White (2006).

2.0 The role of research in facilitating international trade: The case of fruits and fruit flies

2.1 Fruit flies research at SUA

Fruit flies research at SUA started in 2004, in collaboration with the Royal Museum for Central Africa (RMCA) of Tervuren, Belgium. The research was undertaken in two phases from 2004 – 2008, and from 2009 – 2013. Limited research on fruit flies was previously conducted in some parts of Tanzania (see also Mwatawala et al., 2005) under the African Fruit Flies Initiative (AFFI) that was initiated by the then International Centre for Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE) (Mwatawala, 2016). The SUA- RMCA research in Tanzania was concentrated in Morogoro region and focused on biology and ecology    of major pest species. The second part focused on developing an Integrated Management (IPM) of key fruit fly species (Mwatawala et al., 2009b). Later, the IPM project was extended to Mozambique. SUA also participated in the project on resolution of cryptic species to facilitate Sterile Insect Technique (SIT) which was supported and coordinated by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) based in Vienna, Austria. Further research on fruit flies was conducted under the project on “Increasing Value of African Mango and Cashew” in collaboration with Aarhus University, Denmark. SUA has published more than 20 articles on fruit flies, a book chapter, one management plan and an extension manual and a TV program. SUA also organises an international training course on fruit fly taxonomy and ecology, in collaboration with RMCA.

The research at SUA in collaboration with global partners provided very important information which is necessary for facilitating fruits trade through Pest Risk Analysis (PRA). PRA is a process of evaluating biological or other scientific and economic evidence to determine whether or not a pest should be regulated and what phytosanitary measures should be taken against it (IPPC, 1997). PRA is conducted to minimise risks of introduction of pests through movement of fruits. The first step of PRA is categorisation of a pest as quarantine or non– quarantine. Identity and the presence in an area is a key to the categorisation of a quarantine pest. Our research established the biodiversity of fruit flies in Eastern Central Tanzania (Mwatawala et al., 2006a) and has contributed to this important PRA step through the detection of exotic pest species, resolving identity of cryptic species and the description of new pest species. These are highlighted in the sections that follow.

Image 1: Major fruit fly pests in Tanzania (clockwise from top left) B. dorsalis, C. rosa, C. cosyra and C. captata
Image 1: Major fruit fly pests in Tanzania (clockwise from top left) B. dorsalis, C. rosa, C. cosyra and C. captata
 

2.2    Detection of invasions

Various Tephritid species have been accidentally or intentionally introduced into the areas beyond their natural range. For example, Bactrocera carambolae is native to the Oriental Region, but was introduced to Surinam, French Guyana, Guyana and northern Brazil (Amapá) (Sauers-Muller, 1991; Drew and Hancock 1994). Zuegodacus cucurbitae (Coquillett), which is probably native to the Oriental Region, has been introduced into East Africa, Mauritius, the Ryukyu Islands of Japan, New Guinea and the nearby islands, Guam and Hawaii (Munro, 1984; Hooper and Drew 1989; Kakinohana, 1994). Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) which is native to the Oriental Region, has been introduced into Hawaii, Guam, Nauru, and Mauritius and Africa. Ceratitis capitata (Widemann) is native to tropical Africa, but was introduced to the Mediterranean area, Southern Africa, various islands of the Atlantic and Indian Oceans, Western Australia, Hawaii, Central America, and much of South America (De Meyer, 2000). Dacus ciliatus (Loew), which is native to Africa, has been introduced to the Middle East, southern Asia east of Burma, and to Mauritius (White and Elson-Harris, 1992) (See also Norrbomet et al. 1998). Such introductions are an increasing threat of the spread of this pest species, due to a worldwide increase of both commodity shipments (including fresh fruits from other continents) and the booming intercontinental tourism industry. For example, the introduction and presence of the peach Fruit Fly Bactrocera zonata (Saunders) in Egypt and Mauritius, is linked to the movement of infested fruits by human activities and not by natural dispersal. Fruit fly invasions have huge impacts to the horticulture industry (Mwatawala , 2008)

2.2.1 Detection of the Oriental fruit fly Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) (formerly Bactrocera invadens Drew Tsuruta& White) in Tanzania
In 2004, we sampled mango from Matombo Ward, Mvomero District, in Morogoro Region from which a total of 30 adult flies emerged. The specimens were taken to the RMCA for training on identification of Afrotropical fruit fly species. We noted that four individuals in the sample were morphologically different and resembled species native to Asia (Mwatawala et al., 2004). The specimens were sent to Dr. Ian M. White of The Natural History Museum, London, UK and Prof. Richard Drew of Griffith University, Australia both of these confirmed that the species was “new to science” and had been detected for the first time in Kenya in 2003. This Tanzanian record was the second (Mwatawala et al., 2004). The species was later described and named as Bactrocera invadens Drew Tsuruta & White under a common name of the African invader fly. The presence of this species resulted into losses of markets of African fruits, particularly banana Musa sp., mango (Mangifera indica L.) and avocado (Persea americana Miller). Strong quarantine measures against the pest were imposed to prevent spread and introduction of the species into other countries. However, the identity of this species was later disputed, as will be shown in the subsequent sections of this lecture.
 
2.2.2 Detection of the solanum fruit fly Bactrocera latifrons (Hendel) in 2006
We monitored the population of fruit flies at the Horticulture Unit, SUA Main campus in Morogoro, from 2004 to 2013. In June 2006, we noted two specimens that were morphologically similar to Bactrocera dorsalis but with some variations in the abdominal colour pattern (Mwatawala et al., 2006). We suspected that the specimens were not B. invadens. We sent the specimens to the experts  of Bactrocera taxonomy for identification, who found that the species was Bactrocera latifrons (Hendel), a native of Asia, which had never been recorded before in Africa (Mwatawala et al., 2007). The pest was later recorded in neighbouring Kenya. Bactrocera latifrons is of quarantine importance, although restricted to a few families, mainly Solanaceae. The impact of the pest was never felt in East Africa because fresh Solanaceae were not among the major export crops from the region.

2. 3    Resolving identity of cryptic species and description of new pestspecies
The case of the Oriental fruit fly B. dorsalis

The African invader fly B. invadens was thought to be new to science after its detection in Kenya and later in Tanzania (Mwatawala et al., 2004). However, there were two schools of taxonomic thoughts: one school regarded this species as “new to science” and was properly named B. invadens. The other school  of thought held that this species was actually the Oriental fruit fly Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel), a serious pest of fruits native to Asia. Studies which were coordinated by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) revealed a considerable body of evidence spanning from morphological, molecular, cytogenetic, sexual compatibility and chemo-ecological data to reject the current taxonomy of B. invadens as a species distinct from B. dorsalis (Schutze et al., 2014). The existing morphological diagnostic characters, particularly aedeagus length and postsutural lateral vittae, vary continuously across B. dorsalis and B. invadens geographic distributions (Schutze et al., 2014). Scutum colour is highly variable across Africa and the Indian subcontinent but becomes predominantly black in populations of East and South-east Asia. This means that African markets in Asia and Hawaii were opened because the pest was already present. Furthermore, a wealthy of literature which is available in Asia would be optimised for African situation.

2.3.1    The case of Natal fruit fly Ceratitis rosaKarsch and Ceratitis quilici De Mayer Mwatawala &Virgilio
The Natal fruit fly C. rosa is a quarantine fruit fly species which is indigenous to Africa. Studies in South Africa showed that the species is adopted to warmer climates, and this implies that chances of establishment in temperate countries are low. Studies in Re-union showed that C. rosa is adopted to cooler climates,which contradicts the South African findings. We sampled C. rosa along an altitudinal transect on the Uluguru mountain and found that the species occurred in substantial numbers along the transect (Mwatawala et al., 2006a; 2006b; Geurts et al., 2012; Geurts et al., 2014; Mwatawala et al., 2015). The important question is why is the species adapted across a range of climates and hosts? A study by Virgilio et al. (2013) recognized five microsatellite genotypic clusters within the FAR complex, two of which correspond with Ceratitisrosa. Further studies including morphometrics, developmental physiology, cuticular hydrocarbons, pheromones and mating incompatibility (De Meyer et al. 2015) provide evidence that these two genotypic clusters represent two distinct entities that should be considered as separate species. Ceratitis rosa was later determined as a species adapted to low altitude, warm, and humid areas. The other species was new to science and was identified as Ceratitis quilici De Meyer, Mwatawala &Virgilio (De Meyer et al., 2016). This species is adapted to high altitudes and cold areas.

Image 2: Ceratitis qulici showing various parts of the body (source: De Meyer et al., 2016)
Image 2: Ceratitis qulici showing various parts of the body (source: De Meyer et al., 2016)

 
2.3.2    The case of mango fruit fly Ceratitis cosyra (Walker) and C. pallidula De Meyer Mwatawala & Virgilio
The mango fruit fly Ceratitis cosyra is another indigenous pest of quarantine importance. While sampling using terpinyl acetate and later using enriched ginger oil (EGOlure, Insect Science, Tzaneen South Africa) we noted that the flies which were found in traps were smaller compared to C. cosyra (Mwatawala et al., 2012a; 2012b; 2015). We suspected that this was a species which was different from C. cosyra. We later resolved that the species is similar to C. cosyra but can readily be differentiated by the absence of a black spot on the postpronotal lobe and the much smaller size. The species was then described as Ceratitis pallidula De Meyer Mwatawala & Virgilio (De Meyer et al., 2016)

Image 3: Ceratitis pallidula showing various parts of the body (source: De Meyer et al., 2016)
Image 3: Ceratitis pallidula showing various parts of the body (source: De Meyer et al., 2016)

 
2.3.4 The case of Phyllonorycter mwatawalai De Prins
Our IPM project against fruit flies included surveys for micro lepidopidipta moths as potential pests of mango. Surveys were conducted in both cultivated orchards and wild growing mango trees where we recorded several new species; among them was Phyllonorycter mwatawalai De Prins a moth of the Gracillariidae family. This was found in the Morogoro area of Tanzania in a degraded savannah-like habitat, a natural biotope rich in low-growing woody Acacia trees and bushes and thick low dry herbacious vegetation. The pest status of the species is still unknown (De Prins and Kawahara, 2012).

2.4  Determining the Probability of entry, establishment of spread of fruit flies

2.4.1 Host range and preference of fruit flies
Entry, establishment, and the spread of a pest depend on the availability of hosts and favourable climate. The availability of preferred hosts in a PRA  area determines the success of entry and establishment of an exotic pest. Preference is the set of likelihoods of accepting a particular host (Singer, 1986). First of all, host preference takes into consideration the sum of plants that are hosts to an insect species (host range) as well as how acceptable and/ or suitable these hosts are relative to each other (host specificity). Thus, when two hosts are available in equal abundance, the one that is attacked with a high infestation rate is the preferred host. Suitability of a host, which is a key factor of guiding insect choice, depends upon a number of factors such as nutritional quality, host plant defence chemicals, prevalence of natural enemies or microenvironment (Thompson et al., 1991). According to preference- performance hypothesis (optimal oviposition theory), females are assumed to maximize their fitness by ovipositing on high quality hosts. Females visit host plants mainly to oviposit. Thus, the selection of host species and the fruit type for larvae is pre-determined by the egg-laying females. Therefore, a female chooses the best possible host plant on which to oviposit and for her offspring to develop, in other words, “mother knows best” (Prager et al., 2014). See also Mkiga et al. (2015) and Mwatawala et al. (2010a).

We sampled fruits in Tanzania to determine their host status to fruit flies (Mwatawala et al., 2006a; 2006b; 2009c). We found positive samples from 35 different plants from 14 different families. Bactrocera dorsalis had the largest host range (27 species, 12 families) (Mwatawala et al., 2009c). This study added new host species of B. dorsalis that included pomeloCitrus grandis (Burman Merr.), Coffee (Coffea canephora Pierre ex A. Froener), apple (Malus domestica Borkh.), strawberry, guava (Psidium littorale Raddi) African eggplant (Solanum aethiopicum L.), lucky nut (Thevetia peruviana (Pers.) and Schumann) and jambolan (Syzigium cumini (L.) Skeels) bringing the total number of reported hosts to 37. Host range of the other main fruit fly species ranged from 6 to 19.
 
The host range of the major fruit fly species was different with respect to plant families except B. cucurbitae, which was recorded mainly from Cucurbitaceae. Ceratitis cosyra showed predominance for Annonaceae and Anacardiaceae species (Mwatawala et al., 2009c).

Of interest were two controversial hosts of B. dorsalis; banana (Musa sp.) and avocado (Persea americana L.). Previous studies never agreed on the host status of avocado to fruit flies. Sampling results from Tanzania showed that avocado was attacked by B. dorsalis, albeit at low rate of incidences (Mwatawala et al., 2009c). Studies showed that avocado (Hass variety) is a poor potential host for other fruit fly species C. capitata and C. cosyra (De Graaf, 2009). We did not find any positive sample of banana. It was later resolved that green banana cannot be attacked by fruit flies. Only ripe, thin skinned and which   are often split can be attacked by fruit flies (see also Cugala et al. 2013). The markets of banana and avocado lost to South African markets which were then opened.

We also sampled suspected hosts of B. latifrons (Mwtawala et al., 2010b; Mziray et al., 2010) Twelve solanaceous fruit species yielded B. latifrons of which four are new host records: Capsicum annuum L. cov. longum A. DC., Capsicum chinense Jacq., Solanum sodomeum L., and Solanum scabrum Mill. Similarly, three cucurbitaceous fruit species provided positive rearings and these are also new host records: watermelon Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum & Nakai, Cucumis dipsaceus L., and Momordica trifoliata L. The infestation rate and incidence of the pest was mainly high in the solanaceous hosts of nightshades (Solanum nigrum L. and Solanum scabrum) and African eggplants (Solanum aethiopicum Lam. and Solanum anguivi). In a host preference study involving limited number of cultivated solanaceous crops, S. scabrum was recorded as the most preferred host (Mziray et al., 2010).

2.4.2  Spatial and temporal distribution of major fruit flies
The basic processes which determine the population size of a species at any given time are four, namely, Immigration, birth, migration and death. Furthermore population is also determined by intra and inter specific competition, predation (by parasitoids, true predators, parasites and pathogens). Human activities notably management practices such as pesticide application, crop rotation, mixed cropping and trade also determine population size of pests. Furthermore, pest species adopt a set of life strategies of dealing with a life threatening problem. These strategies include age at which reproduction begins, relative energetic efforts devoted to reproduction, growth, survivorship and predator avoidance; diversion of energy to migration and dispersal.  In nature, there  are two groups of individuals; r - selected species whose population sizes fluctuate widely, they live in unpredictable environment, have unpredictable mortality rates, they mature early, are smaller in size and have shorter life span. The k – selected species these have relatively stable populations, they live in predictable environment, have predictable mortality rates; they mature late and have longer life span. Climate is another determinant of population fluctuation.

2.4.3  Seasonal abundance of major fruit fly pests in Eastern Central Tanzania
The temporal occurrence of the invasive and economically important pest fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis was studied in three agro-ecological areas of Morogoro Region and was found to be permanently present at low and mid-altitudes (380–520 m a.s.l.) with peak periods coinciding with the fruiting season of mango and guava (Psidium guajava) (Mwatawala et al., 2006b; 2012c). Its incidence at high altitude (1650 m a.s.l.) was only temporal and was apparently the result of dispersal from lower altitudes after the mango fruiting season. The polyphagous invasive fruit fly B. dorsalis and the indigenous fruit fly C. rosa showed a similar temporal pattern, but were largely separated spatially, with B.    dorsalis being abundant at lower elevations and C. rosa predominant at higher elevations (Geurts et al., 2012; 2014). The abundance of B. Invadens was positively correlated with temperature and mango was a determining factor for B. dorsalis distribution (Geurts et al., 2014)

Figure 1: Temporal abundance of B. dorsalis in Morogoro

Figure 1: Temporal abundance of B. dorsalis in Morogoro
 


2.4.4 The spatial and temporal distribution of B. latifrons in Tanzania 
Surveys were conducted covering the main part of Tanzania along the following axes: Coast – North Eastern zones (to the border with Kenya); Coast – South Western zone (to the border with Malawi and Zambia); Central – North Western zones (to the border with Uganda, Rwanda, Burundi and Congo). The first surveys covered the coast and the northeastern zones of Tanzania, including Dar Es Salaam (Kinondoni District), Coast (Bagamoyo), Tanga (Muheza, Lushoto and Mombo), Kilimanjaro (Hai, Moshi) and Arusha (Arusha and Arumeru). We also covered the south-western regions of Tanzania, including Mbeya (Mbeya, Rungwe and Kyela) and Iringa (Kilolo); the central and north - western regions of Tanzania, including Dodoma (Mpwapwa District), Singida (Singida and Manyoni), Tabora (Nzega and Igunga), Shinyanga (Kishapu), Kagera (Ngara, Missenyi, Bukoba, Muleba and Biharamulo) and Mwanza (Magu, Kwimba, and Misungwi) (Mwatawala et al., 2010b). The routes ensured maximum coverage of the country by reaching the borders to Kenya, Malawi, Zambia, Burundi, Rwanda and Uganda. Our surveys showed that the species was widespread throughout the country but was most abundant in the north- eastern region close to the border with Kenya. The majority of the positive samples were mostly obtained from the African eggplant, Solanum aethiopicum (Mwatawala et al., 2010b). Our studies further showed that B. latifrons is most abundant in low altitude to medium altitude areas (Mziray et al., 2009).

Figure 2: B. latifrons distribution in Tanzania

Figure 2: B. latifrons distribution in Tanzania
 

2.4.5  Potential distribution of B. dorsalis using Climex
Population of B. dorsalis was monitored in twenty-three sampling sites across Benin, Ghana, Kenya, Niger, Senegal, Sudan, Tanzania, and Zambia. These were monitored for two years from 2011 (De Villiers et al., 2016). The locations in Tanzania included Morogoro, Korogwe, Mlingano (Tanga), Makutupora (Dodoma), Songea municipality, and Oldeani (Manyara). Seasonal phenology data, measured as fly abundance throughout the year, were related to each location’s climate to infer climatic growth response parameters. These functions were used along with African distribution records and development studies to fit the niche model for B. dorsalis, using independent global distribution records outside Africa for model validation. We found that areas, which were at the greatest risk of invasion by B. dorsalis include South and Central America, Mexico, southernmost USA, parts of the Mediterranean coast, parts of Southern and Eastern Australia and New Zealand’s North Island. Under irrigation, most of Africa and Australia appear climatically suitable (De Villiers et al., 2016).
 

Image 4: Sampling sites to determine potential distribution of B. dorsalis (source: De Villiers et al., 2016)

Image 4: Sampling sites to determine potential distribution of B. dorsalis (source: De Villiers et al., 2016)
 

   

Image 5: Potential distribution of B. dorsalis in Africa (source: De Villiers et al., 2016)

Image 5: Potential distribution of B. dorsalis in Africa (source: De Villiers et al., 2016)
 

2.5    Assessing the risks of introduction to biodiversity

According to Duyck et al. (2004), the presence of a newly introduced invasive polyphagous species results into competition with native species. In the absence of competition a species occupies a fundamental niche and uses a full range of resources which are needed for its growth and reproduction. The competitive interaction may result either in ecological displacement by which one or both species shifts or reduces its niche until co-existence becomes possible, or in competitive exclusion of one species.Invasive species are often said to be- selected. However, invaders must sometimes compete with related resident species. In this case, invaders should present combinations of life-history traits that give them higher competitive ability than residents even at the expense of lower colonization ability.

Our studies on temporal distribution suggested that B. dorsalis is an r strategist species (rapid population growth and colonization of new habitats, rapid decline in populations during unfavourable conditions, etc.) (Mwatawala et   al., 2006b). On the other hand, Vayssieres et al. (2005) suggesting that the species was a K-strategist, based mainly on its large body size. Duyck et al (2007) suggested that the key traits for invasion in this system were those that favoured competition rather than colonization. Our studies also hinted that B. dorsalis competitively displaced the native C. cosyra (Mwatawala et al., 2006b; 2009a). When we compared demographic parameters of B. dorsalis and the native C. cosyra in controlled environment; our results showed that B. dorsalis larval and pupal development of B. dorsalis was significantly faster than that of C.    cosyra independent of temperatures. Life expectancy of male B. dorsalis was significantly greater than that of C. cosyra; whereas life expectancy of female B. invadens was greater, though not significant, than that of C. Cosyra. The average net fecundity was higher for B. dorsalis than was for C. cosyra. Both species attained their highest intrinsic rate of increase and net reproductive rate at 30°C; B.invadens exhibited the highest intrinsic rate of increase and net reproductive rate at all temperatures tested than did C. Cosyra (Salum et al., 2013). These results provided further evidence that B. dorsalis is both a good competitor and coloniser. We further provided ecvdence of competitive displacement of C. cosyra by B. dorsalis.

2.6  Mitigation of the risks posed by new introductions

2.6.1 Integrated Pest Management (IPM) in Eastern Central Tanzania
According to Aluja (1996), any designed IPM program for managing fruit flies should be viewed as a transition from a chemical dependent control to an ecological model pest management. Natural products such as neem should be researched on their ability to reduce populations of fruit flies. In this regard, a study by Verghese et al. (2006) included a neem-based product, Azadirachtin, in their IPM program for B. dorsalis. Botanical insecticides such as neem are safer to use and are compatible with organic farming. Many new tools and approaches recently developed may be very effective in controlling the fruit fly problem; but whether these tools are compatible with the entire crop production scheme in respect to cost effectiveness is rarely considered (Aluja, 1996). Botanical pesticides and less toxic synthetic pesticides and those with promising results should be recommended to farmers. What should be done at this stage is to adopt a control program from other areas for testing and refining until they are suitable for use in our farming systems. Programs such as initiated by Verghese et al. (2004; 2006) can be adopted and proposed to farmers while ecologically based pest management systems, which are compatible with the Tanzanian farmer situation are being designed (Mwatawala et al., 2009a).

We compared spot application of molasses bait with broadcast sprays of insecticide dimethoate/lambda cyhalothrin (Karate5 EC) and spot application of a spinosad bait (Success, Dow AgroSciences) plus mass trapping using methyl eugenol, as components of IPM programs for B. dorsalis. Orchard sanitation and early harvesting of fruits were standard practices in each program (Mwatawala et al., 2015). We did not record significant differences amongst the three IPM treatments which were evaluated with respect to reductions in the incidence and infestation rates of B. dorsalis in mango (Mwatawala et al., 2015; Mwatawala, 2016). However, the cost-benefit analysis gave positive Cost Benefit Ratios (CBRs) for the molasses bait-based IPM and the insecticide spray-based IPM but not for the IPM based on the GF 120®/ SUCCESS®  bait (i.e. spinosad). IPM based on the molasses bait was ranked the highest in delivering farmers the greatest benefits in terms of CBR, environmental protection and consumer health. Spinosad-based IPM had a low CBR because of its limited availability, high price and high frequency of application compared to conventional insecticides (Mwatawala et al., 2015; Mwatawala, 2016). The developed IPM program was later optimised and tested against B. dorsalis in Manica Province, Mozambique and the results are yet to be published.

Figure 3: Infestation rate of B. dorsalis in mango

Figure 3: Infestation rate of B. dorsalis in mango

 
Figure 4: Incidence of B. Dosalis in mango

Figure 4: Incidence of B. Dosalis in mango
 

2.6.2 Controlling fruit flies using weaver ants Oecophylla longinoda Latreiila (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)
SUA and Aarhus University (Denmark) collaborated in a research programme to increase the economic value of African mango and cashew. We studied  the efficacy of weaver ants, O. longinoda, in controlling fruit flies in mango. Three treatments were compared: (i) trees protected by O. longinoda (ii) trees protected by the insecticide spray, Dudumida® (70WG imidacloprid, Mega Generics Ltd., Tanzania) and (iii) unprotected trees (control) (Mwatawala, 2016; Abdulla et al., 2017). Overall, the incidence (percentage of infested samples) and the infestation rate (number of emerged adult flies per unit weight of fruits) of fruit flies were significantly lower on both the O. longinoda and the Dudumida- protected trees compared with the control. Although the lowest incidence of fruit flies was recorded in fruits from the O. longinoda treatments, there was no significant difference in incidence or infestation rate between the O. longinoda and Dudumida (Mwatawala, 206; Abdulla et al., 2017).

Figure 5: Incidence of B. dorsalis in mango (Source: Abdulla et al., 2017).

Figure 5: Incidence of B. dorsalis in mango (Source: Abdulla et al., 2017).
 

Colonies of Oecophyllas pp. can be transplanted from wild habitats into orchards. The transplanted colonies can only survive in the presence of egg laying queens. It is difficult to locate the nests with egg laying queens in    large colonies that may sometimes contain more than 100 nests. Our studies
 
developed an efficient method of locating a nest with a queen in a colony (Nene et al., 2017). We also explored and developed methods for rearing newly mated queens in nurseries. At first, little was known about the mating behavior of O. longinoda, particularly the timing of nuptial flights. We found that sexuals of weaver ants aggregated on the nest surfaces prior to the flights. We also found that flights took place during the rainy season, and mostly in the evenings just before sunset. (Nene et al., 2015). The days of flights were associated with higher relative humidity and less sunshine; the flights mainly took place around full moons. We also investigated four methods which may be used to collect mated queens that can subsequently be used to stock ant nurseries. We found that light trapping was the most efficient way of collecting queens followed by leaf traps, random search, and lastly paper traps (Rwegasira et al., 2014).  We also observed that queens were best reared under continuous, indirect access to water. Rearing mated queens under continuous indirect access and continuous direct access to water methods saved energy and time, because of limited attendance to the colonies (Rwegasira et al., 2015). Availability of water, sugar solution, and different sources of protein throughout improved the growth of young colonies.

Image 6: Management plan of fruit flies in Tanzania

Image 6: Management plan of fruit flies in Tanzania
 

2.6.3 Management plan for fruit flies in Tanzania
Future plan for fruit fly management in Tanzania proposes an Area Wide Programme to extend research and implementation of IPM to other parts       of the country (Mwatawala et al. 2013). The objectives of this management plan include (i) establishing the nationwide status of economically important fruit flies (ii) assessing the nationwide economic impact of fruit flies on the horticultural industry (iii) evaluating the available mechanisms for fruit fly control
(iv) formulating management programmes for mitigation of fruit fly problems  in horticulture nationwide, and (v) re-enforcing long term awareness, capacity building and collaboration. The government of Tanzania and its research institutions are actively looking for funds to finance these activities (Mwatawala et al., 2013).

2.6.4 Training programs
SUA and RMCA organise a training course in taxonomy and systematics of African fruit flies at the Sokoine Pest Management Centre. The objective of this group training is to offer basic training on the identification and ecology   of African fruit flies that have an economic impact on agriculture. The course consists of topics on morphology, classification, identification, identification methods, collection methods, and conservation methods.

3.0 Conclusion

This inaugural lecture highlighted key research findings on fruit flies based on studies conducted at SUA in collaboration with other partners. The information that was generated by years of research is necessary to facilitate fruits trade while minimising the risks of the spread of fruit flies. The lecture showed further that this information is shared through various means including an international training on taxonomy and ecology of fruit flies.

4.0 References

Abdulla, N.R., Rwegasira, G.M, Mwatawala, M.W. (2017). Efficacy of African weaver ant, Oecophylla longinoda (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in reducing losses due to frugivorous fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in smallholder mango production systems in Eastern Tanzania. Biocontrol Science and Technology http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09583157.2017.139 1173

Bellavia, A., Larsson, S.C., Bottai, M., Wolk, A., Orsini, N. (2013). Fruit and vegetable consumption and all-cause mortality: a dose-response analysis. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 98: 454-459.

Cugala, D., Ekesi, S., Ambasse, D., Adamu, R.S., Mohamed, S.A. (2013). Assessment of ripening stages of Cavendish dwarf bananas as host or non-host to Bactrocera invadens. Journal of Applied Entomology 38(6). https://doi.org/10.1111/jen.12045
 
Dauchet L, Amouyel P, Hercberg S, Dallongeville J. (2006). Fruit and vegetable consumption and risk of coronary heart disease: a meta- analysis of cohort studies. Journal of Nutrition 136: 2588–2593.

De Graaf, J. (2009) Host Status of Avocado (‘Hass’) to Ceratitis capitata, Ceratitis rosa, and Ceratitis cosyra (Diptera: Tephritidae) in South Africa Journal of Economic Entomology 102(4): 1448-1459

De Meyer, M. (2000). Systematic revision of the subgenus Ceratitis MacLeay s.s. (Diptera: Tephritidae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 128: 439 – 467.

De Meyer, M. (1996). Revision of the subgenus Ceratitis (Pardalaspis) Bezzi, 1918 (Diptera, Tephritidae, Ceratitini). Systematic Entomology 21: 15-26.

De Meyer, M. (1998a). Additional notes and records on subgenus Ceratitis (Pardalaspis) BEZZI, 1918 (Diptera: Tephritidae). Bulletin et Annales de la Société Royale belge d’Entomologie 134: 199-202.

De Meyer, M. (1998b). Revision of the subgenus Ceratitis (Ceratalaspis) Hancock (Diptera: Tephritidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 88: 257-290.

De Meyer, M. (2000). Systematic revision of the subgenus Ceratitis MacLeay s.s. (Diptera: Tephritidae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 128: 439 – 467.

De Meyer, M. and Copeland, R. (2001). Taxonomic notes on the afrotropical Subgenera Ceratitis (Acropteromma) Bezzi and C. (Hoplolophomyia) Bezzi (Diptera: Tephritidae). Cimbebasia 17: 77 - 84.

De Meyer, M. and Freidberg, A. (2006). Revision of the subgenus Ceratitis (Pterandus) Bezzi (Diptera: Tephritidae). Israel Journal of Entomology 35-36: 197 - 315

De Meyer, M., Delatte, H., Ekesi, S., Jordane, K., Kalinova, B., Manrakhan, A., Mwatawala, M., Steck, G., Van Cann, J., Vancikova, L., Brizova, R., Virgilio, M. (2015). An integrative approach to unravel the Ceratitis FAR (Diptera, Tephritidae) cryptic species complex: a review. Zookeys 540: 405 – 427.

De Meyer, Mwatawala, M., Copeland, R.S. and Virgilio, M. (2016). Description of new Ceratitis species (Diptera: Tephritidae) from Africa, or how morphological and DNA data are complementary in discovering unknown species and matching sexes. European Journal of Taxonomy 233: 1-23.

De Prins, J. and Kawahara, A. (2012). Systematics, revisionary taxonomy, and biodiversity of Afrotropical Lithocolletinae (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae). Zootaxa 3594: 1-283.
De Villiers, M., Hatting, V., Kriticos, D.J., Brunel, S., Vayssiers, J.F., Sinzogan, A., Billah, M.K., Mohamed, S.A.,

Mwatawala, M.W., Abdelgader, H., Salah, F.E. and De Meyer, M. (2016). The potential distribution of Bactrocera dorsalis: considering phenology and irrigation patterns. Bulletin of Entomological Research 106: 19 – 33 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0007485315000693

Drew, R.A.I. and Hancock, D.L. (1994). The Bactrocera dorsalis complex of fruit flies (Diptera: Dacinae) in Asia. Bulletin of Entomological Research Supplement 2: 1-68. FAO. (2017). FAOSTAT. United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). FAOSTAT http://www.fao.org/faostat Site accessed on 12th December 2017

Geurts, K., Mwatawala, M.W. and De Meyer, M. (2012). Indigenous and invasive fruit fly Diptera: Tephritidae) diversity along an altitudinal transect in Eastern Central Tanzania. Journal of Insect Science 12:12.

Geurts, K., Mwatawala, M.W. and De Meyer, M. (2014). Dominance of an invasive fruit fly species, Bactrocera invadens, along an altitudinal transect in Morogoro, Eastern Central Tanzania. Bulletin of Entomological Research 104(3): 288 – 294.

Hooper, G.H.S. and Drew, R.A.I. (1989). Australian and south Pacific islands. In: Fruit flies, their biology, natural enemies and crops. (Edited by Robinson,A.S. and Hooper, G.H). Elsevier, Amsterdam. pp 67 - 72.

Hung, H.C., Joshipura, K.J., Jiang, R., Hu, F.B., Hunter, D., et al. (2004). Fruit and vegetable intake and risk of major chronic disease. Journal of National Cancer Institute 96: 1577– 1584.

Kakinohana, H. (1994). The melon fly eradication program in Japan. In: Fruit flies and the sterile insect technique. (Edited by Calkin, C. O., Klassen, W. and Liedo, P.). CRC Press, Boca Raton. pp 223-236. IPPC. (1997). International Plant Protection Convention. Rome, IPPC, FAO.

Lim, S.S., Vos, T., Flaxman, A.D., Danaei. G., Shibuya. K. et al. (2012) A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990? 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. The Lancet 380: 2224–2260.

Mkiga, A., Mwatawala, M.W. (2015). Developmental Biology of Zeugodacus cucurbitae (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Three Cucurbitaceous Hosts at Different Temperature Regimes. Journal of Insect Science 15(1): 160.

Munro, H.K. (1984). A taxonomic treatise of the Dacidae (Tephritoidae: Diptera) of Africa. Department of Agriculture and Water Supply, Republic of South Africa, Entomological Memoir 61: 1-313.

Mwatawala, M.W., White, I.M., Maerere, A.P., Senkondo, F.J. and De Meyer, M. (2004). A new invasive Bactrocera species (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Tanzania. African Entomology 12(1): 154-158.

Mwatawala, M.W., Senkondo, F.J., Maerere, A.P. and De Meyer, M. (2005). Current status of and future needs for fruit fly research in Tanzania. International Pest control 47 (4): 184-187.

Mwatawala, M.W. De Meyer, M., Makundi, R.H. and Maerere, A.P. (2006a). Biodiversity of fruit flies (Diptera, Tephritidae) at orchards in different agro-ecological zones of the Morogoro region, Tanzania. Fruits 61 (5): 321 – 332.

Mwatawala, M.W. De Meyer, M., Makundi, R.H. and Maerere, A.P. (2006b). Seasonality and host utilization of the invasive Bactrocera invadens (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Central Tanzania. Journal of Applied Entomology. 130 (9-10): 530 – 537.

Mwatawala, M.W. De Meyer, M., Makundi, R.H. and Maerere, A.P. (2007). Detection of the Solanum fruit fly, Bactrocera latifrons (Hendel) in Tanzania (Dipt., Tephritidae). Journal of Applied Entomology  131(7): 501 – 503.

Mwatawala, M.W., De Meyer, M., Makundi, R.H. and Maerere, A.P. (2008). Invasions by Bactrocera sp.  in Africa:  Its implication  on  horticulture in Africa. A key note speech given at the International Congress of Entomology (ICE 2008), International Convention Centre, Durban, South Africa 6 – 11th July 2008.

Mwatawala, M.W. De Meyer, M., Makundi, R.H. and Maerere, A.P. (2009a). An overview of Bactrocera (Diptera: Tephritidae) invasions and their speculated dominancy over native fruit fly species in Tanzania. Journal of Entomology 6(1): 18 – 27.

Mwatawala, M.W. De Meyer, M., Makundi, R.H. and Maerere, A.P. (2009b). Design of an ecologically based IPM program for fruit flies (Diptera: tephritidae) in Tanzania. Fruits 68: 83-90.

Mwatawala, M.W. De Meyer, M., Makundi, R.H. and Maerere, A.P. (2009c). Host range and distribution of fruit-infesting pestiferous fruit flies (Diptera: tephritidae) in selected areas of Central Tanzania. Bulletin of Entomological Research 99: 629-641.

Mwatawala M., Maerere, A., Makundi R.H. and De Meyer, M. (2010a). Seasonality and host plant preference of Bactrocera cucurbitae in Central Tanzania. International Journal of Pest Management 56(3): 256-273.

Mwatawala M., A. Maerere, R.H. Makundi and M. De Meyer. (2010b). On the occurrence the Solanum fruit fly, Bactrocera latifrons (Hendel) (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Tanzania. Journal of Afrotropical Zoology 6: 83-89.

Mwatawala, M.W. Virgilio, M., Quilici, S. Dominic, M. and De Meyer, M. (2012a). Field evaluation of the relative attractiveness of EGOlure and trimedlure for African Ceratitis species (Diptera: Tephritidae). Journal of Applied Entomology 137(5): 392-397.

Mwatawala, M., Virgilio, M., Quilici, S., Dominic, M. and De Meyer, M. (2012b). Field evaluation of the relative attractiveness of EGO lure and trimedlure for African Ceratitis species (Diptera: Tephritidae). 2nd Tephritid Workers of Europe, Africa and the Middle East (TEAM) Meeting (Kolymbari, Crete). Book of abstracts. 91.

Mwatawala, M., Maerere, AP., Rwegasira, GM., Makundi, RH., Virgilio, M.and De Meyer, M. (2012c). Seasonal and annual abundance of Bactrocera invadens in Central Tanzania. 2nd Tephritid) Workers of Europe, Africa and the Middle East (TEAM) Meeting (Kolymbari, Crete). Book of abstracts. 43.

Mwatawala, M. W., De Myer, M., Seguni, Z., Rwegasira, G. M., Muganyizi, J., Senkondo, F. and Shechambo L. (2013). Management plan of fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) pests Tanzania. Sokoine University of Agriculture, Directorate of Research and Postgraduate Studies, Morogoro. ISBN 978-9987-640-35-5.

Mwatawala, M.W., Mziray, H., Malebo, H. and De Meyer, M.. (2015). Guiding farmers’ choice for an integrated pest management program against  the invasive Bactrocera dorsalis Hendel (Diptera: Tephritidae) in mango orchards in Tanzania. Crop Protection 76: 103 – 107.

Mwatawala, M., Massimiliano Virgilio, M., Joseph, J. and De Meyer, M. (2015). Niche partitioning among the two Natal fruit fly morphotypes and other Ceratitis pest species. ZooKeys 540: 525 – 538.

Mwatawala, M.W. (2016). Integrated management of fruit flies – case studies from Tanzania. In: Ekesi, Mohamed S. A. and De Meyer, M. (Editors). Fruit fly Research and Development in Africa - Towards a Sustainable Management Strategy to Improve Horticulture. Springer (In Press) 517 – 529.

Mziray, H.A., R.H. Makundi, M.W. Mwatawala, A. Maerere and M. De Meyer (2009). Spatial and temporal abundance of the solanum fruit fly Bactrocera latifrons (Hendel) in Morogoro, Tanzania. Crop Protection 29: 454-461.

Mziray, H.A., R.H. Makundi, M.W. Mwatawala, A. Maerere and M. De Meyer (2010). Host use of Bactrocela latifrons (Hendel), a new invasive tephritid species in Tanzania. Journal of Economic Entomology 103(1): 70 – 76.

Nene, W.A., Rwegasira, G.M., J Offenberg, J., Mwatawala, M., Nielsen, GM (2015). Mating Behavior of the African Weaver Ant, Oecophylla longinoda (Latreille) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology 62(3): 396-400.

Nene, W.A., Rwegasira, G.M., Nielsen, M.G., Mwatawala, M., Offenberg, J. (2016). Nuptial flights behavior of the African weaver ant, Oecophylla longinoda Latreille (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and weather factors triggering flights. Insectes Sociaux 63: 243 - 248

Nene, W., Rwegasira, G.M. and Mwatawala, M. (2017). Optimizing method  for locating weaver ant Oecophylla longinoda Latreille (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) queen nest in cashew, Anacardium occidentale L. plantations in Tanzania. Crop Protection 102: 81 – 87.

Norrbom, A.L., Carroll, L.E., Thompson, F.C., White, I.M., and Freidberg, A. (1999). Systematic Database of Names. In: Fruit fly expert identification system and systematic information database. (Edited by Thompson, F.C.) Backhuys Publishers, Leiden. pp 65 - 251.

Prager S.M., Esquivel I. and Trumble J.T. (2014). Factors influencing host plant choice and larval performance in Bactericera cockerelli. PLoS One 7(9)

Rwegasira, R.G., Mwatawala, M.W., Rwegasira, G.M., Mogens, G.M. and Offenberg, J. (2014). Comparing different methods for trapping mated queens of weaver ants (Oecophylla longinoda; Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Biocontrol Science and Technology 25(2): 503 -512.

Rwegasira, R.G., Mwatawala, M., Rwegasira, G.M. and Axelsen, J. (2015) Optimizing methods for rearing mated queens and establishing new colony of Oecophylla longinoda, Latreille (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Journal of Tropical Insect Science 37(4): 217 – 224

Schutze, M.K. et al (2014). Synonymization of key pest species within the Bactrocera dorsalis species complex (Diptera: Tephritidae): taxonomic changes based on a review of 20 years of integrative morphological, molecular, cytogenetic, behavioural and chemoecological data. Systematic Entomology 40(2): 458 – 471.

Salum J.K., Mwatawala M.W., Kusolwa P., De Meyer M. (2013). Demographic parameters of the two main fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) species attacking mango in Central Tanzania, Journal of Applied Entomology 138(6): 441–448.

Singer, M.C. (1986). The definition and measurement of oviposition preference, in: Miller J., Miller T,A. (Eds) Plant–Insect Interactions, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.pp 65–94.

Szajdek., A. and Borowska., E.J. 2008. Bioactive Compounds and Health- Promoting Properties of Berry Fruits: A Review. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition 63: 147.


Thompson, J.N., Pellemyr O. (1991). Evolution of oviposition behavior and host preference in Lepidoptera. Annual Review of Entomology 36: 65–89.

Virgilio M., Delatte H., Quilici S., Backeljau., T., De Meyer. M. (2013) Cryptic diversity and gene flow among three African agricultural pests: Ceratitis rosa, Ceratitis fasciventris and Ceratitis anonae (Diptera, Tephritidae). Molecular Ecology 22: 2526–2539. doi: 10.1111/ mec.12278

Virgilio, M., Delatte, H., Nzogela, Y.B., Simiand, C., Quilici, S., De Meyer, M., Mwatawala, M. (2015). Population structure and cryptic genetic variation in the mango fruit fly, Ceratitis cosyra (Diptera, Tephritidae). ZooKeys 540: 525-538.

Virgilio, M., Manrakhan, A., Delatte, H., Daneel, J.H., Mwatawala, M., Meganck, K., Barr, N. and De Meyer, M. (2017), The complex case of Ceratitis cosyra (Diptera, Tephritidae) and relatives. A DNA barcoding perspective. Journal of Applied Entomology. doi:10.1111/jen.12379

White, I.M. and Elson-Harris, M.M. (1992). Fruit flies of economic significance: their identification and bionomics. CAB, Wallingford. 601pp.

White, IM. (2006). Taxonomy of the Dacina (Diptera: Tephritidae) of Africa and the Middle East. African Entomology Memoir No. 2.

Weinberger, K., Lumpkin, T.A. 2007. Diversification into horticulture and poverty alleviation: A research agenda. World Development 35: 1464 - 1480.

Yao LH, Jiang YM, Shi J, Tomás-Barberán FA, Datta N, Singanusong R, Chen SS (2004) Flavonoids in food and their health benefits. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition 59: 113-122.

 

About the author

Prof. Maulid Walad Mwatawala was born on 1st November 1970, in Mbeya Municipality. He received secondary education from Sangu and Mazengo Secondary schools of Mbeya and Dodoma regions respectively. He later obtained Bachelor of Science (1995), Master of Science in Agriculture (1998) and PhD (2008) all from Sokoine University of Agriculture (SUA). He also graduated in Bachelor of Laws (LLB, Hons.) from Open University of Tanzania (OUT) in 2013 and Master of Law in Information Technology and Telecommunication (LLM IT&T) which is jointly offered by OUT and the United Kingdom Telecommunications Academy (UKTA) in 2015. He started his professional career at SUA in December 2000 as an Assistant Lecturer in the Department of Crop Science and Horticulture (DCSH). He then rose to the ranks of Lecturer (2005), Senior lecturer (2008), Associate Professor (2011) and finally Professor (2017).

He teaches courses in Applied Entomology, Organic Farming and (Agricultural) Legislations, Reduction of Post-Harvest Losses and Wastages through Good Agricultural Practices (GAPs). Prof. Mwatawala is a member of the Governing Council of the Tropical Pesticides Research Institute (TPRI); a member of Ministerial Advisory Board (MAB) of the Tanzania Food and Drugs Agency (TFDA); Chairman of the Plant Quarantine and Phytosanitary Sub - committee (PQPS) of the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries. He is also a Vice Chairman of the Tanzania Entomological Association (TEA). Prof. Mwatawala served as Editor in Chief of Tanzania Journal of Agricultural Sciences (TAJAS), between 2012 and 2016.

His current research focuses    on ecology and management of fruit flies. He is currently the Head of the Department of Crop Science and Horticulture DCSH, a position he has held since August 2017. He was involved in projects on Integrated Pest Management (IPM) for fruit flies in Tanzania; Increasing value of African mango and cashew (funded by DANIDA, Resolution of cryptic species complexes of tephritid pests to overcome constraints to SIT application; enhanced fruits preservation using nano technology.

Prof Mwatawala has published 64 articles in peer reviewed journals, one book chapter and numerous conference papers and extension materials. He received a number of awards including the Best Student Award by the Ecological Society for East Africa (ESEA) in 2008.
 

Like & Share this page